Financhill
Buy
88

GFS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$48.75
Seasonality move :
-3.6%
Day range:
$43.20 - $48.88
52-week range:
$29.77 - $48.88
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
29.93x
P/S ratio:
3.99x
P/B ratio:
2.31x
Volume:
7.7M
Avg. volume:
4M
1-year change:
21.55%
Market cap:
$27.1B
Revenue:
$6.8B
EPS (TTM):
-$0.09

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
GFS
GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.
$1.8B $0.47 1.66% -8.34% $43.95
AMD
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
$9.7B $1.32 32.48% 190.87% $288.50
INTC
Intel Corp.
$13.4B $0.08 -2.91% -99.89% $47.17
KLAC
KLA Corp.
$3.3B $8.80 9.96% 10.52% $1,665.28
MRVL
Marvell Technology, Inc.
$2.2B $0.79 20.39% 274.72% $116.15
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
$12.9B $3.96 133.61% 502.04% $382.23
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
GFS
GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.
$48.74 $43.95 $27.1B 29.93x $0.00 0% 3.99x
AMD
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
$213.58 $288.50 $348.2B 80.75x $0.00 0% 10.09x
INTC
Intel Corp.
$48.29 $47.17 $241.2B 5,117.92x $0.13 0% 4.13x
KLAC
KLA Corp.
$1,479.50 $1,665.28 $193.9B 42.98x $1.90 0.5% 15.40x
MRVL
Marvell Technology, Inc.
$81.34 $116.15 $69B 28.48x $0.06 0.3% 9.11x
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
$410.34 $382.23 $461.8B 39.01x $0.12 0.11% 10.95x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
GFS
GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.
12.43% 0.994 8.33% 1.96x
AMD
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
5.76% 2.726 1.1% 1.79x
INTC
Intel Corp.
29.13% 1.498 23.92% 1.31x
KLAC
KLA Corp.
52.78% 1.903 3.83% 1.86x
MRVL
Marvell Technology, Inc.
26.36% 4.600 6.23% 1.56x
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
17.52% 3.611 4.69% 1.52x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
GFS
GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.
$419M $195M -0.31% -0.36% 11.55% $406M
AMD
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
$5.3B $1.8B 6.72% 7.14% 17.07% $2.4B
INTC
Intel Corp.
$5.2B $820M 0.02% 0.02% 6% $800M
KLAC
KLA Corp.
$2B $1.4B 42.85% 100.25% 41.01% $1.3B
MRVL
Marvell Technology, Inc.
$1.1B $367.4M 13.51% 18.3% 17.71% $507.6M
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
$7.6B $6.1B 17.9% 22.98% 44.95% $3B

GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns GFS or AMD?

    Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. has a net margin of 14.75% compared to GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.'s net margin of 15.77%. GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.36% beat Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.14%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GFS
    GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.
    24.82% $0.44 $13.4B
    AMD
    Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
    51.42% $0.92 $66.8B
  • What do Analysts Say About GFS or AMD?

    GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. has a consensus price target of $43.95, signalling downside risk potential of -14.32%. On the other hand Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $288.50 which suggests that it could grow by 35.08%. Given that Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. has higher upside potential than GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc., analysts believe Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. is more attractive than GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GFS
    GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.
    6 12 0
    AMD
    Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
    36 11 0
  • Is GFS or AMD More Risky?

    GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. has a beta of 1.941, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 94.149%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GFS or AMD?

    GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GFS or AMD?

    GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are smaller than Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. quarterly revenues of $10.3B. GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.'s net income of $249M is lower than Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.'s net income of $1.6B. Notably, GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 29.93x while Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.'s PE ratio is 80.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. is 3.99x versus 10.09x for Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GFS
    GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.
    3.99x 29.93x $1.7B $249M
    AMD
    Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
    10.09x 80.75x $10.3B $1.6B
  • Which has Higher Returns GFS or INTC?

    Intel Corp. has a net margin of 14.75% compared to GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.'s net margin of -2.44%. GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.36% beat Intel Corp.'s return on equity of 0.02%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GFS
    GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.
    24.82% $0.44 $13.4B
    INTC
    Intel Corp.
    38% -$0.12 $173.3B
  • What do Analysts Say About GFS or INTC?

    GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. has a consensus price target of $43.95, signalling downside risk potential of -14.32%. On the other hand Intel Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $47.17 which suggests that it could fall by -2.32%. Given that GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. has more downside risk than Intel Corp., analysts believe Intel Corp. is more attractive than GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GFS
    GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.
    6 12 0
    INTC
    Intel Corp.
    8 32 2
  • Is GFS or INTC More Risky?

    GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intel Corp. has a beta of 1.386, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.623%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GFS or INTC?

    GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intel Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intel Corp. pays out 8.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Intel Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GFS or INTC?

    GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are smaller than Intel Corp. quarterly revenues of $13.7B. GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.'s net income of $249M is higher than Intel Corp.'s net income of -$333M. Notably, GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 29.93x while Intel Corp.'s PE ratio is 5,117.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. is 3.99x versus 4.13x for Intel Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GFS
    GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.
    3.99x 29.93x $1.7B $249M
    INTC
    Intel Corp.
    4.13x 5,117.92x $13.7B -$333M
  • Which has Higher Returns GFS or KLAC?

    KLA Corp. has a net margin of 14.75% compared to GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.'s net margin of 34.77%. GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.36% beat KLA Corp.'s return on equity of 100.25%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GFS
    GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.
    24.82% $0.44 $13.4B
    KLAC
    KLA Corp.
    59.62% $8.73 $11.6B
  • What do Analysts Say About GFS or KLAC?

    GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. has a consensus price target of $43.95, signalling downside risk potential of -14.32%. On the other hand KLA Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1,665.28 which suggests that it could grow by 12.56%. Given that KLA Corp. has higher upside potential than GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc., analysts believe KLA Corp. is more attractive than GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GFS
    GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.
    6 12 0
    KLAC
    KLA Corp.
    13 13 0
  • Is GFS or KLAC More Risky?

    GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KLA Corp. has a beta of 1.467, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.659%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GFS or KLAC?

    GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. KLA Corp. offers a yield of 0.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.90 per share. GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KLA Corp. pays out 22.23% of its earnings as a dividend. KLA Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GFS or KLAC?

    GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are smaller than KLA Corp. quarterly revenues of $3.3B. GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.'s net income of $249M is lower than KLA Corp.'s net income of $1.1B. Notably, GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 29.93x while KLA Corp.'s PE ratio is 42.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. is 3.99x versus 15.40x for KLA Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GFS
    GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.
    3.99x 29.93x $1.7B $249M
    KLAC
    KLA Corp.
    15.40x 42.98x $3.3B $1.1B
  • Which has Higher Returns GFS or MRVL?

    Marvell Technology, Inc. has a net margin of 14.75% compared to GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.'s net margin of 91.65%. GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.36% beat Marvell Technology, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.3%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GFS
    GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.
    24.82% $0.44 $13.4B
    MRVL
    Marvell Technology, Inc.
    51.57% $2.20 $19.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About GFS or MRVL?

    GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. has a consensus price target of $43.95, signalling downside risk potential of -14.32%. On the other hand Marvell Technology, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $116.15 which suggests that it could grow by 42.8%. Given that Marvell Technology, Inc. has higher upside potential than GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc., analysts believe Marvell Technology, Inc. is more attractive than GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GFS
    GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.
    6 12 0
    MRVL
    Marvell Technology, Inc.
    26 12 0
  • Is GFS or MRVL More Risky?

    GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marvell Technology, Inc. has a beta of 1.967, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 96.661%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GFS or MRVL?

    GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marvell Technology, Inc. offers a yield of 0.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marvell Technology, Inc. pays out 23.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Marvell Technology, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GFS or MRVL?

    GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are smaller than Marvell Technology, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.1B. GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.'s net income of $249M is lower than Marvell Technology, Inc.'s net income of $1.9B. Notably, GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 29.93x while Marvell Technology, Inc.'s PE ratio is 28.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. is 3.99x versus 9.11x for Marvell Technology, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GFS
    GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.
    3.99x 29.93x $1.7B $249M
    MRVL
    Marvell Technology, Inc.
    9.11x 28.48x $2.1B $1.9B
  • Which has Higher Returns GFS or MU?

    Micron Technology, Inc. has a net margin of 14.75% compared to GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.'s net margin of 38.41%. GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.36% beat Micron Technology, Inc.'s return on equity of 22.98%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GFS
    GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.
    24.82% $0.44 $13.4B
    MU
    Micron Technology, Inc.
    56% $4.60 $71.3B
  • What do Analysts Say About GFS or MU?

    GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. has a consensus price target of $43.95, signalling downside risk potential of -14.32%. On the other hand Micron Technology, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $382.23 which suggests that it could fall by -6.85%. Given that GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. has more downside risk than Micron Technology, Inc., analysts believe Micron Technology, Inc. is more attractive than GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GFS
    GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.
    6 12 0
    MU
    Micron Technology, Inc.
    28 3 2
  • Is GFS or MU More Risky?

    GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Micron Technology, Inc. has a beta of 1.517, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.672%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GFS or MU?

    GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Micron Technology, Inc. offers a yield of 0.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Micron Technology, Inc. pays out 6.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Micron Technology, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GFS or MU?

    GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are smaller than Micron Technology, Inc. quarterly revenues of $13.6B. GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.'s net income of $249M is lower than Micron Technology, Inc.'s net income of $5.2B. Notably, GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 29.93x while Micron Technology, Inc.'s PE ratio is 39.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. is 3.99x versus 10.95x for Micron Technology, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GFS
    GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.
    3.99x 29.93x $1.7B $249M
    MU
    Micron Technology, Inc.
    10.95x 39.01x $13.6B $5.2B

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Will UnitedHealth Stock Recover?
Will UnitedHealth Stock Recover?

Shares of embattled health insurance giant UnitedHealth (NYSE:UNH) plummeted by…

Is Lumentum The Best Laser Stock to Buy?
Is Lumentum The Best Laser Stock to Buy?

Though certainly less well-known than the huge tech businesses that…

Is Planet Fitness Stock Undervalued?
Is Planet Fitness Stock Undervalued?

Planet Fitness (NYSE:PLNT) has had a difficult 12 months, retreating…

Stock Ideas

Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x

Buy
58
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Sell
40
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 29x

Alerts

Buy
91
TDC alert for Feb 12

Teradata Corp. [TDC] is up 29.7% over the past day.

Buy
67
DIOD alert for Feb 12

Diodes, Inc. [DIOD] is up 26.39% over the past day.

Buy
73
AEHR alert for Feb 12

Aehr Test Systems [AEHR] is up 26.09% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock